.

Spending of Some Measure E Funds Explained in Audit

Almost $4 million was spent in fiscal year 2010 on projects and services directly related to Measure E, according to a report presented to the Board of Education in January.

A performance audit conducted last year of the Beverly Hills Unified School District Measure E bond program explains some of the $13 million in Measure E funds that have been spent since the first series of bonds were sold in early 2009.

As Patch , these funds have been spent before any major construction projects have started at the city’s five schools. The $334 million Measure E bond was passed by voters in 2008 to modernize the city's schools.

According to the audit report conducted by San Diego firm Christy White Accountancy Corp., almost $4 million was spent in fiscal year 2010 on projects and services directly related to Measure E.

The report was presented to the Board of Education in January 2011. Patch reviewed it after readers requested further reporting on how Measure E money has been spent.

The report describes $3.83 million in spending during fiscal year 2010, which ended June 30:

  • $1.077 million for projects at Horace Mann school
  • $708,888 at Beverly Hills High school
  • $455,492 at El Rodeo school
  • $420,712 at Hawthorne school
  • $137,503 at Beverly Vista school
  • $503,304 in legal fees
  • $494,582 in program administration costs
  • $30,724 for “facilities and planning,” which include some of the salaries and benefits of the facilities staff

The report does not detail which school projects were conducted with these funds. At Horace Mann, the money paid for tearing down the school’s annex and erecting bungalows, board Vice President Brian Goldberg said in the comments section of Friday’s story.

About $2.1 million was spent on vendor Strategic Concepts in the prior fiscal year ending June 2009, the report notes. Strategic Concepts is the educational company started by former BHUSD facilities manager , who will be tried on four conflict of interest charges.

The auditors suggested that any funds “recovered from Strategic Concepts should be reimbursed to the Measure E Bond Building Fund.”

BHUSD filed a complaint against Strategic Concepts in 2009 seeking to recover $4 million in fees, and Christiansen filed a countersuit to recoup $16 million related to the Strategic Concepts contract. The litigation has prompted significant spending of Measure E funds.

“As of …November 2010, $642,986 in legal expenses has been paid from Measure E funds, with significant portions of this amount spent on the Strategic Concepts litigation,” the report notes, adding that BHUSD “received an opinion from its bond counsel that these legal fees are permissible expenditures.”

Since that time, the district has spent more than to L.A.-based law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. Quinn Emanuel has represented BHUSD in legal proceedings against Christiansen and former Superintendent Jeffery Hubbard.

Editor's Note: This article errored in originally stating that Karen Christiansen is facing two counts of misappropriation of public funds. The D.A. has dropped those charges.

Be sure to follow Beverly Hills Patch on Twitter and "Like" us on Facebook.

Miss BH April 21, 2011 at 04:17 AM
Marie will you be amending the counter suit as well?
Mr. BH April 24, 2011 at 09:17 PM
Does anyone know if MissBH is a former employee of Strategic Concepts? I think that would shed a lot of light on her public misinformation campaign
Miss BH April 24, 2011 at 09:43 PM
I am not connected to Strategic Concepts and I never worked for the school district. All of my information comes from court documents and BHUSD Board minutes. An Audit report is based on impartial information giving to them by current employee's that may not have been there during that time. An Auditor is not required to verify the informantion giving to them. Again it's in black and white on public record so if you want to take the auditors word over the courts and the Disrict Attorney then you will have to wait and see who takes the fall.
Mr. BH April 25, 2011 at 04:04 AM
So this is not the personal or former personal assistant for Karen Christensen? Not the same person who was warend by the Judge that her behavior was threatening to the DA prosecuting the case and who was admonished by the Judge that if her behavior continued that she would be brought up on charges?
Miss BH April 25, 2011 at 04:36 AM
No that is not me and that person never worked for Karen Christiansen either. What does it matter? look it up, you dont have to take my word for it, look it up. Its really simple. This artical was amended wasnt it? So maybe my public misinformation campaign had some merit to it. The whip cream on that sunday is that Christiansen and Hubbard are no longer codefendants because their cases have been seperated and 4 of the 8 charges have been dropped on her. If Im making it up call me out and Ill take full responsabilty and tell you who Iam.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »