patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

With Obama in Town, Protesters Rally to Fight Big Money in Politics

A rally in Beverly Hills seeks to raise awareness of the influence large donations have in political campaigns.

 

Demonstrators gathered at Will Rogers Memorial Park in Beverly Hills Wednesday to protest the role that large private and corporate donations and SuperPAC funds are playing in political campaigns.

"We're very disappointed, of course, that [President] Obama, who called SuperPACs 'a threat on democracy,' has recently decided that he will encourage his donors to give to SuperPACs once they've maxed out of giving to his campaign," said event organizer and Occupy Los Angeles Food Committee member Lauren Steiner. "This is going to be $2 billion raised in this presidential election, and that money could be spent far better on the human needs of the 99 percent instead of allowing one-percenters to buy a dinner with the president."

The park where the protest was being held is located on Sunset Boulevard between North Crescent and Benedict Canyon drives. The Occupy 90210 group, which organized the protest, chose the site because of its proximity to Holmby Hills, where Obama was attending a campaign fundraising dinner at the home of soap opera producer Bradley Bell. Attendees at the dinner were being charged $35,800 a plate. According to Steiner, that amount could buy dinners for 17,000 people from one of Los Angeles' food banks.

"We think it's unconscionable that these people are here spending this kind of money just to hobnob with the president," Steiner said.

In addition to protesting campaign financing, Wednesday's rally was also planned to raise money for Hunger Action L.A.'s Veggie Voucher program, which doubles the purchasing power of food stamps at farmers markets. 

Linda Holter, co-organizer of the West L.A. Council of MoveOn.org, participated in the rally and said she wanted to bring awareness to the influence that money has in political campaigns.

"I'm not as outraged at Obama taking the money, persoanlly, because that's the reality of our times," Holter said. "That is how money is raised. The issue for me, and for us: Get the big money out of politics altogether and then it won't be something that [candidates] have to do in order to survive."

Barry Levine, a member of Move to Amend, came out to protest the large donations that corporations can legally make to campaigns. Move to Amend rejects the U.S. Supreme Court's January 2010 Citizens United ruling that the government cannot ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections. 

"I would like to see the Constitution of the United States amended to state that corporations don't have the rights of human beings and that money is not equal to free speech," Levine said. "I am a very big believer that we need to change the law constitutionally so that the Supereme Court's ruling in Citizens United won't stand, and they can't make any other foolish decisions because the law will be very clear like most people can understand, not legalese drawn up by lawyers who work as lobbyists."

Protester Nigel Mitchell, wearing a sign on the back of his jacket that read "Greed Kills End Wars," said he has attended multiple rallies in the area to spread a message of love and peace.

"It's time to say enough's enough," he said.

During the rally, an Occupy 90210 protestor was hit by a car and taken to Ceders-Sinai Medical Center.

For updates on the protester's condition and the event itself, follow @OccupyLA on Twitter.

Related Topics: Citizens United, Citizens United v. the Federal Elections Commission, Obama, Occupy 90210, Occupy LA, Protest, SuperPAC, and Will Rogers Memorial Park
Do you think corporations should be allowed to donate to political campaigns? Tell us in the comments.

Wendy

7:55 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

It's very strange that the 1 percent will give $35,800 a plate to see Obama back in office. He has been criticizing them for not paying their fair share. Make a person think that Rush is Right. He tells the 99 percent one thing and the ruling class 1 percenters that he will keep the 99 percent down.

Reply

Scott Zwartz

6:58 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Any Prez who appoints Geithner as Sec of Treas supports the 1% and not the 99%

What about the hundreds of millions of missing tax dollars right here in L.A.?

Why did the City Council give billionaire Eli Broad $52 Million for a garage for his art museum? How much of the City $52 M has found its way back into the secret campaign coffers of Garcetti, Wesson, Perry, Cardenas?

What about CRA-CIM Midtown Project and Wesson, where CRA-CIM Group gets incremental tax dollars, the sales taxes and the city guarantees the loans? How much money found it was way back into the campaigns of Wesson and Jan Perry and other cuncil members?

Where is the missing $1.4 M on the CRA 1601 N Vine appraisal fraud? Did it go directly to Garcetti? or to his friend Steve Ullman? or to Hal Katersky? Where did the public funds go?

So it seems that in Washington DC, the corporations pay their bribes (er, excuse me, "campaign contributions") with their own money, but in L.A., it looks as if the city council gives millions of tax dollars to developers who can then a return a portion of the loot as campaign contributions.

Reply

Gary Gorlick

7:07 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

17,000 could have had a meal!.......17, 000 for each seat! Who is right?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Scott Zwartz

7:53 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

According to the new economics of Obama/Gethner and the far right wing baggers, feeding people makes them weak. Remember Goldman sachs was Obama's large campaign contributors and Obama refused to have Glass-Steagall re-instated.

The 1% has gotten more favorable treatment under Obama than they would have under MCain, because the Dems would have objected if McCain did any of the horrible things Obama has one. Currently Obama is trying to defun d soc sec so that it becomes economically unsound, thereby providing a basis for the GOP to re-start their demands to privateize soc sec.

While Obama caved into every petty demand of Wall Street, the Dems stood by in silence. If mccain had been prez, they would have screamed and hollerd and stopped it.

SYlvia Danton

9:53 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

This president had damn well collect all he can or we will all pay at the end of the day with a super wealthy GOP clown once again.. And take a better look at the president today and his acomplishments,he has never been the problem.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Wendy

10:00 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

@SY

That is some real good logic. What accomplishments? He doubled the national dept and called that progress. He also works for Banksters and Wall Street. None of them have gone to court for stealing. So your logic is that he better take all the money he can from Banksters and Wall Streeters so we can have somebody honest more honest.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Marie Cunningham

11:09 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I can say that thanks to Obama's Income-Based Repayment Plan, my grad student loans have become manageable. It is a huge accomplishment of the president, which has genuinely changed my life.

Wendy

11:27 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

They just had a story on last night (George Noorey) on how Students are getting ripped off on loans as You end up paying a whole lot more. Obama's Income Based Retirement plan. What is that social security renamed?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Marie Cunningham

11:34 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

No need to turn a completely positive comment into something negative. Now that there is job growth in the nation, how will naysayers spin that in their favor?
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-01-23/politics/30485008_1_unemployment-rate-obama-election-day

Wendy

11:48 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Federal Job growth is not real Job Growth. Losing manufacturing positions and getting a job at Wendys Hamburgers in return can be debated.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Marie Cunningham

12:03 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

"Federal Job growth is not real Job Growth."
Why is that not real job growth again?

Reply

Wendy

2:03 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

If Obama creates more Federal Jobs that is not real Job Growth. That is just stealing from the taxpayers and creating fake jobs to check permits. They take away what you used to be able to do on and give somebody a fake job where they have to rubber stamp you permission.

Marie why do the 1 percenters want Obama in office? He is their guy. That should scare the hell out of the ordinary person. It makes no sense that they want to pay double taxes. The people of Beverly Hills are cheap are they not? If you look in their garages you will find junk that is not worth ten dollars that they cannot part with.

Part of being the president is that you get to control the numbers that are put out for job growth. Those stats are like reading the 5 o'clock follies. Figures do not lie but liars figure.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Marie Cunningham

2:28 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Nothing in the link I provided says anything about federal job growth. It refers to payroll jobs added. So whatever point you are trying to make...you missed the mark completely. And to call Beverly Hills residents "cheap" is a rude assumption on your part. And who said that one-percenters want Obama in office?

Liberty Jackson

2:40 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

aww so cool that you reported this, thanks Marie!!

Reply

Leave a comment